Chelsea 3-1 Birmingham City : What Might Have Been and How It All Went Wrong

This is the way it was supposed to be.
Chelsea suffocating and demoralizing. The central defense oppressive. The midfield unruffled and in control. The fullbacks daring.
And the Golden Boot, Didier Drogba, terrorizing his enemy into submission.
For reasons we’ll get into, the promise of Chelsea’s season was dashed by the reality.
But for a day we could dream of what might have been.
Ancelotti fielded Chelsea’s favorite 4-3-3. An “old school” midfield of Lampard, Essien and Mikel. A frontline that blended old with new, Kalou getting a start with Malouda and Drogba.
And backing them up, a massively powerful bench waiting to fill in the holes. Anelka and Torres to score. Benayoun and Zhirkov to support the attack. Ivanovic to defend and a youngster ready for some experience.
Just like in our pre-season dreams, it all went perfectly. Drogba was once again the Man of the Match, fearsomely strong, quick and daring. In the 3rd minute his backward head flick sent the ball to Malouda at the far post, who only had to push it in for Chelsea’s first goal. John Terry began the move with a beautiful cross pass to find Ferriera.
Then the profligate Kalou stunned everyone with a brilliant individual display, running the ball across the top of the box then unleashing an unstoppable shot into Foster’s bottom left corner. 
Later, with the game comfortably in control, a youngster is blooded and plays well, just as Chelsea’s brass had planned when they assembled this squad last summer. In this case it was left back Ryan Bertrand, in for Ashley Cole, who lofted a pinpoint pass to find Malouda in between two defenders, a simple header giving the Frenchman his second score.
David Luiz made the kind of silly over-aggressive play that is beginning to define his defending, to concede a penalty.
But other than that blip, this was how Chelsea’s season was supposed to be. A comfortable 3-1 win and everyone happy.
With such promise, how did it all go so horribly wrong? Carlo Ancelotti answered that question on Tuesday.
“I don’t think the squad was good enough this year.”
The plan for this season, a plan Ancelotti says he supported, was to replace old players with young ones and gradually give them playing time. It was assumed that the veterans would be strong enough to carry the load while the kids learned on the job.
But as we’ve found out, that was a wildly optimistic plan. Injuries, age and illness exposed Chelsea’s squad as thin and inexperienced.
Ancelotti again:
“But at the start of the season we couldn’t have envisaged having very important players all out at the same time.”
“We struggled to manage this – without Lampard, Drogba, Essien, Terry, Alex. It was very difficult to move on without these kind of players – not just their technical qualities but their personality and character. We missed them in November and December when we didn’t play well. I think it cost us quite a few points. Before the ‘difficult moment’ we’d used our younger players, like [Gaël] Kakuta and [Daniel] Sturridge.
“We’d done it gradually but it was harder to put the responsibility on them when the difficult moment came.”
Perhaps the signature game of the “difficult moment” was the shocking 3-0 home loss to Sunderland in November.
Who could Ancelotti turn to for help when his starters struggled? Let’s look at Chelsea’s bench for that match: Sala, Bruma, Kakuta, Van Aanholt, McEachran, Turnbull and Kalou.
A bunch of inexperienced kids and Kalou. Not exactly as strong as Wednesday’s bench of Torres, Anelka, Zhirkov, Ivanovic and Benayoun.
That, ladies and gentleman, is the story of Chelsea’s season.
The midfield has been a mess. Lampard just isn’t the same player. He’s been slow and off form since his injury and I think he’s too old to ever be the player he was just a season ago. Ramires is the best midfielder but he’s a runner/tackler, not a creator. There’s nobody in the midfield to run things. Hard to believe this, but journeyman Yossi Benayoun’s season-long injury was a huge blow.
Midfield/attack is also a problem. Malouda went off the boil a couple of months into the season. Without Zhirkov (injured) he played too many games. He’s 30 years old and can’t do that. Drogba’s malaria visibly sapped his strength and speed. Only in the last 2 weeks does he seem to have recovered. Torres needs a full off-season to recover both mentally and physically from the last 18 months. He should never have played in the World Cup.
The result is that Chelsea have had no finishing for most of the season. Kalou is the very definition of a wasteful player. And they blundered with Sturridge. He came to life in a reserve match on January 6th but Carlo never gave him a chance in a Premier League match and eventually loaned him out. Huge mistake.
The defense has been good. But there’s no right back. Ferreira is just awful. Bosinga has only slowly recovered from a long-term knee injury and he was never a star anyway. At left back Ashley Cole has played almost every single match and is completely worn down. Center-back has been a strength. Terry’s actually had a good season since coming back from his back injury. Ivanovic, Alex (when available) and Luiz have been pretty good.
But I look to personnel management last summer as the real problem. For depth, they placed ridiculous expectations on young players like Bruma, van Aanholt, Kakuta and McEachran. The squad is old, thin, injury-prone and suffering from World Cup exhaustion. 
None of this is lost on the players themselves. Since recovering his health Drogba is playing like a man possessed — and like a man at risk of losing his job. Florent Malouda just gave himself a mohawk, possibly an emotional response to his precarious status for next season.
This has been a season of turmoil for Chelsea.
And yet there’s still a glimmer of hope. 5 games to go and 6 points behind.
Hope. A tease. Just enough to tempt a fan into wondering what might have been.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1379020/Manchester-United-3-Chelsea-0-Keane-Morrison-send-Reds-Youth-Cup-final.html
Chelsea’s favourite formation: 4-4-3 :)
Terry was so confident today after long time. Luiz, once again, conceded a penalty, he should be very careful in danger zone. He is good player, but not that perfect as we think.
Now, Arsenal and Chelsea have equal chance to win a title, but I still believe Manu will never loose much point from there.
Good to see Chelsea winning! Keep on wining!
Good win. Good article.
Amazingly, we’re still in the race for the league trophy. I know, the margin for error is low and a lot needs to go right for us to do what’s realistically improbable. But in the short-term, I don’t think it’s out of the question for an in-form Everton team to bog United down this weekend and grind out a point. If we take care of business against West Ham, all of a sudden the gap is reduced to four points.
Oops!
Thanks for the catch. I corrected it.
It’s unusual for the Man of the Match not to be the guy who scored 2 goals. And Malouda deserves credit for putting himself in the right positions.
But his finishes were elementary. Drogba, on the other hand, was the creative engine on this day, always trying things, constantly testing Foster. It would be a shame to see him leave. I’m sure he has another good year in him.
I think the decisions to let go of Cole, Belleti, Deco, Carvalho and Ballack were all wise ones. All of these players were either old, injury-prone or past it.
What hurt us this season were players who under-performed.
Remember, at the end of last season, we suffered from a good deal of injuries and at times could only field a thin bench (hence the awful Belletti getting lots of playing time). Ashley Cole and Essien were long-term absentees while Mikel and Ivanovic missed portions of the run-in. Carvalho had trouble with injuries too. Yet, what compensated for all of this were the performances of our key men. Malouda, Drogs, Lamps were all brilliant. This season, they went missing when we needed them the most.
Every team suffers debilitating injuries during the season. Evan Man U did this year. I’ll admit we had a thin squad at times but what hurt us more were the poor performances of our talismen.
what i feel chelsea gotta improve is david luiz should be more careful,he’s gr8 nonetheless…and carlo ancelotti shouldnt put anelka and torres in…and take malouda and kalou out…we lost the width in tt and u can see nobody feeding torres…making him add on to his goalless tally
My version of ‘how it all went wrong’
We knew how big our squad was at the beginning of the season. We also knew that we had some 30+ players who could be affected by injuries. If we thought all these 30+ players would play all season, that’s a terrible blunder. Carlo had said at the beginning of the season that 3-4 youngsters would find their way into the first team. He even called Josh to be ready for premier league.
We had injuries. Which other team didn’t have injuries? In fact, we were one of the less-injury-affected teams in the whole league. Man Utd had bigger list of injuries including for very key players like talisman Rooney and captain Ferdinand. Arsenal were ravaged by injuries. They took risks in using those opportunities to blood youngsters. We missed it.
Bottomline is, Carlo didn’t take risks, which he could have. You can blame it on job security or whatever, the fact is that he didn’t. There were times when our senior players were playing very poorly that any of those youngsters wouldn’t have done any badly. This could be hindsight but that’s the difference between us fans and the managers. We could see things in hindsight. Managers should have the vision.
“I don’t think the squad was good enough this year. At the start of the season, we couldn’t have envisaged having very important players out at the same time and we struggled to manage that,”
I don’t find the above comment from Carlo reasonable. As I said, in a squad where we have a few key players in 30+, you gotta expect and prepare for it. We apparently didn’t foresee this problem and didn’t prepare well. And it almost sounds like we were missing a few big names all for a couple of months. No. The one thing I’d agree with Carlo is “WE STRUGGLED TO MANAGE THAT”. Hell yes!
By the way, it was a good performance last night. Wish we were performing like this when we were under pressure. Especially Malouda – sucked when it mattered and when the title is ‘officially’ out of reach, he comes back roaring like a lion! Nevertheless, good performance.
The Lampard bashing is getting old. The guy tore up the EPL one year ago and was on fire to start the season. Then he got hurt. Give him more than a month to get back in form.
This team is in 2nd place. If they win against Man Utd they’d be 3 points out of first. It’s an old team that got hurt by the World Cup. Chelsea’s timing of dumping all their depth before the World Cup was a mistake since this year was the year they’d need the depth.
All the older players who played in World Cup have been bad for big chunks of this year (or all year) and it’s not just Chelsea.
Cole, Essien, Lampard, Torres, Drogba, Malouda, and Anelka have been bad at times and injury plagued. English players Rooney, Gerrad, Joe Cole, and Defoe have had down years. Spain’s Cesc Fabregas had 15 goals last year and just 3 this year. Jesus Navas has played in 15 La Liga matches but played in all 38 last year. Suarez had 35 goals in 33 matches last year for Ajax and before moving to Liverpool he had 7 goals in 13 games, way below the pace from the year before. Arjen Robben has only been healthy for 14 matches all year! Ryan Babel was such a shell that he left Liverpool. Elia has played in a dozen fewer matches than a year ago. Heitinga played in 31 of Everton’s 38 EPL games last year and has played in just 15 this year. Diego Forlan has scored 18 fewer goals this year than last year, Former Chelsea MF Ballack has played in 14 matches all year after playing in 45 last season. Fellow German Stefan Kiebling has 7 goals in 16 matches after having 21 goals in 35 matches last year. Diego Milito scored 30 times in 51 games last year, he’s played 18 games this year and scored just 7 times. Higuain has missed 1/2 the season as has Ever Banega. Walter Samuela has almost missed the entire year. Yoann Gourcuff’s scoring is way down, Toulan has played in 1/2 the games he did last year as has Aloud Diarra same with Mathieu Valbuena. Pienaar scored 7 times last year. He’s scored once this year. Marcell Jansen has played in only 12 games. Daniel Agger got seriously hurt and is out for the year after playing just 16 EPL games. Italian Chiellini has just played 5 Serie A games and fellow Italian De Rossi has had a bad year all around.
Now not all these players are having bad years because of the World Cup. Some are playing just as well but are unlucky. Some players have worse stats but that’s because they got replaced by a better player (Abou Diaby by Jack Wilshere) and some players have had random injuries. But this was a list I was able to compile quickly from players that stood out to me. Sadly I can’t watch every match so most of these are just guesses based of the stats but we all know Malouda hasn’t been the same this year even if the states look similar, proving that there may be many more players who played in the World Cup who’ve had down years even if the numbers don’t show it (like American Landon Donovan).
Look most these guys play 45+ times a year. I know adding 3-6 matches on top of that doesn’t seem like a lot but 1. These players got no time off and have been playing 2 consecutive seasons now 2. The World Cup matches aren’t ever easy and probably drain players the same as a UEFA match or a Chelsea-Man U fixture in April and 3. These players had all the qualifiers and practices where they had to go all out to make the starting squad. When Lampard is feeling tired at Chelsea he can back off at practice. But England has numerous options and unless you’re Drogba for Cote D’Ivoire you need to compete like mad for your team. Chelsea just unloaded their depth a year too early.
People are so naive. We beat Birmingham and suddenly we are back to our best! LOLOLOL
Great Article. I liked it.
Hi guys, wow I just have to say something.
As I feel the need to educate the masses.
This is the main and probably only question you should ask yourself: How can you go into the campaign (season) with only 19 outfield players and 3 of those players are infield goalkeepers? Let’s do the math 19 players and 3 players being goalkeepers.
Carlo Ancelotti is a big reason why Chelsea had such a poor season. Why did Carlo Ancelotti spend 17m on Ramires, when there are such alot of quality players in the world. Why did Carlo Ancelotti integrate these rubbish Academy players into the squad: Jeff Bruma, Josh Mcachran,Gael Kakuta and Patrick Van Aanholt. These players are Arsenal, Barca, Man Utd, Man City and Madrid rejects and are Championship players at best.
Chelsea is a completely unprofessional club. It must be like working in a circus taking a job at this club. The employer and employees are so under-qualified at the positions they hold at the club. Carlo Ancelotti doesn’t dicipline the players when they’re playing poorly by dropping them to the bench or if they conduct themselves in a manner which is embarassing towards the club. Arsenal, Man Utd, Barca and Madrid are fine examples of the way a football club should be run.
If you perform badly at the above mentioned clubs you can be sure that you’re going to be looking for a job next season. At Chelsea its like a free for all, as everybody can just carry on with the nonsense they get up to during the season. I’m tired of supporting clowns. Please give me men that I can support and admire.
P.S. Just take a look at Roman Abramovich’s wikipedia article. Cheers!
Please read Roman Abramovich’s wikipedia article. I feel the need to educate the masses.
You know David Blaine the world reknown black magic magician. I hate magic by the way, as its evil! Anyway he stood over the River Thames in a glass box in 2005 for 44 consecutive days. He holds the record for doing nothing in a box for the longest period of time. Well I think that Fernando Torres broke David Blaine’s record for the man doing nothing in a box for the longest period of time. Get it! Cheers!
@Michael u better stay away from this blog and support the Red Devils or other **** clubs .And btw Why compare Roman with Glazers.Roman has poured his money in the club ,while Glazers acquired Man United.
Money spent by Glazers on Man U a big ******* 0
Coming on Real Madrid they have more then dozen mangers during the last 10 -12 season.
Real fired Del Bosque after winning the champions league “becuase they were boed with sucess
they fired Pelegrini for gaining 97 points last season
@Aasim why should I support Man Utd as I’ve been a Chelsea supporter throughout my whole life. If I could be honest with you I even bleed, so that make my blood blue. Roman Abramovich is a low-class Russian gangster and he should be put behind bars in a Russian prison, along with the state seizing all his assets. Atleast the Glazers obtained their fortune honestly and legally. You want to talk about Madrid the amount of managers they had in the last ten seasons. You’re being silly, it feels like you’re bringing a knife to a gun fight. I’ll ask you this question. How many managers have Chelsea had in the past 5 seasons: Jose Mouriniho, Avram Grant, Phil Scolari and Carlo Ancelotti.
You want to talk about Madrid firing managers then why did Roman Abramovich (Russian mobster) sack Jose Mourinho regardless of how many honours he brought to the club. Because he played boring or unatractive football? Damn, aren’t you a hypocrate?
The facts state that this is an unprofessional bunch of men trying to emulate their fellow huge clubs. As I said it must be like working in a circus taking a job at this club. The employer and employees are so under-qualified at the positions they hold at the club. Roman Abramovich, the man that doesn’t give interviews is a Russian gangster. Carlo Ancelotti doesn’t dicipline the players when they’re playing poorly by dropping them to the bench or if they conduct themselves in a manner which is embarassing towards the club. Arsenal, Man Utd, Barca and Madrid are fine examples of the way a football club should be run.
The Chelsea players are very immature. For example take a look at Didier Dragba, a grown man relaxing his hair and using hair-straitner or Ashley Cole shooting people with an air-gun for fun.
If you perform badly at the above mentioned clubs you can be sure that you’re going to be looking for a job next season. At Chelsea its like a free for all, as everybody can just carry on with the nonsense they get up to during the season. I’m tired of supporting clowns. Please give me men that I can support and admire. Cheers!
It’s not over till the famous fat lady sings, you know
Keith,
One of the most valid comments I’ve read for a long time.
And you’re supposed to be the Elite then, give me a break. “cheers”-man
As long as Chelsea make it the darnn hardest for ManUre to win title this year, I ,for one is satisfied !
Did you guys notice the sadness on Kalou’s face ? he is leaving for sure.
@DanaBlue if you got something to say to me then say it like a man. I’m not going to waste my time on idiots. Cheers!
@Michael cheers mate,dont be sad
Maysam Kalou has to stay!!!!!!! With the way he has performed everytime he has played this season he deserves a long term contract extension.
We should sell Anelka and bring back Borini and Sturrige in Summer. Dany and Fabio can pair up with Torres where we can play 4-4-2 and we can play kalou and Malouda and Drogs in the 4-3-3.
Another question is now who is better? Bertrand or Van Anholt?
Ever heard of Ravel Morrison? A star on Manchester United’s FA Youth Cup team. Played this week.
Pleaded guilty to two counts of intimidating a witness. Held the person at knifepoint for 2 days.
Played this week. For Manchester United. How a club should be run.
What planet are you from you b****y clown? Educate the masses? Who the **** are you to make these claims you arrogant little p***?
Honestly…
Btw, agree with the defence of lampard. You would think players would be entitled to a little bit of respect. After playing out of his skin for so almost a decade for the club you get so many people slating him at the first oppurtunity. What a bunch of plastic classless fans we are!
Thinking we know football because we play FM and Fifa on our little laptops and consoles.
Of course we have the right to our opinions, but to act as though we are some sort of experts and those people who whole life it is to understand and work in football know knothing…
The only circus there is at Chelsea is the one made of clowns and fraudsters and bandwagoners like Michael.
I hope some you were able to catch the Copa del Rey final between Madrid and Barca.
A fantastic match. Incredibly intense. In the first half Mourinho abandoned his long-ball tactics of the last Clasico and launched a full out attack,. Dominated. Second half Barca came back and played their game. Dominated.
Extra time was Barca trying to possess and Madrid breaking out. Finally di Maria broke down the left side and lofted a beautiful pass to Ronaldo on the far side of the box, who placed a strong and excellent header across the keeper.
I can’t believe the ref was Spanish. He actually let them play. In Spain they normally whistle a foul when the wind changes. But not this guy. It actually seemed to cut down on Barcelona’s disgusting theatrics.
Hell of a match. So intense I’m not sure how Madrid will elevate themselves for the Champions League matches against Barca.
I hope rumors about Benitez joining chelsea are nothing but jokes!!! I really hate that guy….Plus he is a big loser
He’s had a poor season since coming back from series of injuries that kept him out for months.
Would you rather pretend that he’s playing well? To me, that would be dishonest. He’s not playing well, everyone can see it.
Frank Lampard’s my favorite Chelsea player. He has character, guts, integrity and massive amounts of skill. Not for one minute would I consent to dishonoring him.
I hope he can be his old self next season. But he’ll be 33. Age catches up to everyone. He’s been so fit throughout his career that he may defy the odds.
I fervently hope so.
wxwax,
Wxwax, I wasn’t having a go at you for your comment on lampard. It’s the comments I’ve been seeing in general on all different websites, hearing from so called Chelsea fans when talking about Chelsea.
It’s the kind of dismissive, disrespectful language fellow Chelsea fans use as if they’re talking about a pile of garbage and not a Chelsea LEGEND.
There are some players who deserve to be spoken about with a degree of respect, who deserve more time than others when going through bad spells – players who should be honoured even when they’re finished.
@Wxwax he is not the first young footballer to end up in court. The club’s view is that the good outweighs the bad and they are determined to give Morrison the help he needs, in all parts of his life. “The club does not in any way condone Ravel’s actions, but he is a very talented player with a bright future ahead of him,” a spokesman said. “The right thing to do now is to support him and help him in the process of his rehabilitation.”
I don’t know what’s wrong with trying to help a troubled teenager get is life in order. Wxwax the men at Man Utd are like “saints” in my opinion. Cheers!
fog,
There’s no reason to use that kind of language, son. Only small men react the way your type does! If you’re so worried about my credentials then why don’t you Google me. Cheers!
Air gun accident bad.
Knifepoint kidnapping good.
Got it.
I’m with you 100%, Fog.
wxwax,
“The club does not in any way condone Ravel’s actions, but he is a very talented player with a bright future ahead of him,” a spokesman said. “The right thing to do now is to support him and help him in the process of his rehabilitation.”
Ah, the world according wxwax. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry mate. You intentionally and deliberately might I add only give us one side of the story and that is your side of the story. Ravel Morrison didn’t kidnapp anyone he just went to the witness house and intimadated him with a knife on consecutive days. Which part of the Man Utd spokesman saying that the club does not condone what the young footballer has done don’t you understand. How can you compare Ashley Cole, a grown man’s actions against a poor troubled teenagers. But if this makes sense to you, then hey whatever floats your boat, man. Finally, I’m going to ask you to stop distorting the facts so that it can support your argument mate. Cheers!
No big deal, then.
Glad to see United have their priorities straight. Football first, criminally threatening people second.
Model club.
Michael, Michael, from the circus (with credentials) – You’re not fooling anyone.
You ought to contort your head back out your rear end and have a look at your own posts, and see what a pretentious, pontificating little p**** you come accross as.
And how fanstastically witty and original of you with your David Blaine/Torres box joke.
BTW, Circus, clown, contortionist. GET IT?
My my, how clever I am!
CHEERS!
Michel copied his argument about Ravel Morrison from this article…talks about educating the massess???
“he is not the first young footballer to end up in court. The club’s view is that the good outweighs the bad and they are determined to give Morrison the help he needs, in all parts of his life. “The club does not in any way condone Ravel’s actions, but he is a very talented player with a bright future ahead of him,” a spokesman said. “The right thing to do now is to support him and help him in the process of his rehabilitation.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/feb/19/ravel-morrison-manchester-united
wxwax, You know when I read what I’ve written I said to myself that I should not have written that but I was typing what I was thinking. Apologize. But you’re distorting the facts so that it can support your argument. But here is a clearly troubled teenager who according to different experts think that this kid can really do something with his life by giving him another chance. You’re such loser.
fog, I don’t understand why you have to use that vulgar language. I’m a Born-again christian and I’m going to pray for you. I can only imagine what your family must think of you. If you want to attack me on what I’ve said in my comment about the topic, about Chelsea only bringing in 16 infield players during campaign then sure go ahead. If you think that they’re aren’t clowns for doing this. Ok. If you disagree, fair. But if its because you’re going to defend a mobster or an adulterous (Frank Lampard) then you need GOD, my friend.
Abishek, you’re heading places, probably to Scotland Yard. It must have taken you all of what a second to find that article. I quoted from the article, maybe you should go to bed. Cheers!
Wow I can see that my comment is being moderated. If I offended you then I’m sorry and especially, as it is by some means taboo to talk about God in this day and age. Got it. In my defence I didn’t rubbish anyones comments or use offensive language. Cheers!
Michael, before you go…
Could you arrange for Wayne Rooney to come down to West London and show us how players from a model club address television cameras?
Also, maybe some tips from a model club on how to throw a Christmas party? Some pointers on rape would be lovely.
Cheers, mate.
The point here is that the argument you mentioned….
“He is not the first young footballer to end up in court. The club’s view is that the good outweighs the bad and they are determined to give Morrison the help he needs, in all parts of his life.”
This is exactly not your views or argument as you copied someone’s opinion.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/feb/19/ravel-morrison-manchester-united
Thus your argument lacks substance. But some of the other points you argue are good and does have some value and meanings.
BC you must be blind to say Ferreira was bad. Dis u even watch the game? He had bosingwa in his back pocket. Get fn rid of bosingwa.
Michael, have you ever heard of “presumption of innocence?” God knows, Roman doesn’t need my defending, but he is not criminal until proven guilty, and he was neither convicted nor tried for any wrongdoing. But how I could argue with you, you got your facts from Wikipedia.
Roman is my former compatriot, but even this is not the reason for my generally positive views of him. If such a huge but archaic country as Russia could only produce 10-15 creative men who would overturn and restructure the whole economy, these 10-15 men must be worth something, and deserve some respect, don’t you think? Yeah, maybe the methods were sometimes murky, but the times there were murky too, and Roman would be no more guilty in this then Rockefeller was at his time. Only history would judge these men, so hold your judgement. BTW, Roman did a lot of good deeds too back at home, but you wouldn’t find a lot of that, or any of that, in Wikipedia.
I have a question for you: how come you spent years being a Chelsea fan if you have such a deep hate for these players and this unprofessional group of managers? Seriously, what was holding you here? Stop pretending, you are not Chelsea fan and never were. You are a fraud and a blowhard, “mate”.
michael michael michael
how long has it been?……..aren’t ye fed up of getting publicly humiliated???
or do u have some sick sense of humour that actually makes u enjoy it………..
sigh……….its hopeless……..
man utd….model club????…….really???……..sure cantona kung fu kicking a fan should be perfectly fine then….or how bout scholesy and his numerous tackles……rooney……..ronaldo…….fake ronaldo(nani)…….anderson(crybaby),fletcher(anti-football)…….keano(great player but man was he crazy)………g neville(mad…..beyond imagination mad)……..
sure these are lovely players from a model club eh?
mceachran,van aanholt, bruma,etc…….players who deserve to play in the championship????………they’re youth players douchebag…..a couple of years and they may be brilliant……….
like i said its hopeless and franlky we’re tired
So anyway a message to all the other blogger’s…..next time u see a message from michael……..ignore it…….it’s probably for the best……
LOL! Me blind? Check your eyes mate! Wxwax wrote this piece :)
By the way, personally I thought Ferreira had a good match. He played with little more freedom and appeared more purposeful than usual.
I did see the Madrid vs Barca copa del rey final. Real Madrid’s resurgence continues. Just like the league game, Real Madrid came out as the better team with lovely football. Quite a turnaround from the 5-0 defeat. This must be a sweet revenge. This is why the man is special – beating this Barca team in a final. Jose has turned a dream of the Real Madrid fans into a reality.
Tactically, Madrid were spot on. Barca might have had a lot of possession but that’s a combination how Barca play and how Madrid wanted to play. They were happy to let Barca have the ball and close the spaces to pose questions to the Barca attack. To play Pepe in the midfield was a masterstroke. It was a real surprise to all and man, didn’t he play well! In both the league and the final, Madrid were thoroughly successful in nullifying Dani Alves. Totally subdued and inside the pockets. Messi was also very well negotiated. Madrid went with a clear plan and came out winners.
Meanwhile, Madrid had more opportunities on the other end. Finally, the Madrid goal was beautiful. The one-two between Marcelo and Di Maria was brilliant and what a cross under pressure by Di Maria! Ronaldo broke his (goal from outfield play) duck against Barca. Messi is yet to break his (goal from outfield play) duck against Jose Mourinho. Copa Del Rey title after 19 years. First title in more than 3 seasons.
This Real Madrid team is improving certainly. They’re still not there yet and they have some distance to go. By the next season, they could be a dangerous team. And that’s a good thing for European football. They are giants and they need to be back. With the final being so intensive, will they have enough focus and energy to play the champions league semi finals? To play this Barca team 4 times in 3 weeks is such a demanding affair. For now, it’s evenly poised. Barca will come back like a wounded animal. If they get an away goal at Madrid, they could be in the champions league final. Will be very interesting.
What’s happening here with Michael? Go easy on him lads! I’ll swim through personal attacks of ourselves and players and owners in the comments below to pick up this interesting topic. Are Man Utd a model club?
Man Utd are a model club? From an ownership and administration point of view – NO. Purely on football matters – Why not?They are one of the best run clubs – their vision and football aspirations, their revenue model, the way their owners work with the manager, the youth academy and its outputs, their business in the transfer market, the way the manager deals with the players, the pride with which their players play and their support that fills their large stadium week in week out and the turnout they get for their reserve games and youth games and last but not the least, their ability to sustain success for long periods.
Man Utd can be model club for many clubs. In fact, there could be a lot of clubs at lower leagues that try to emulate the Man Utd model. Individual errors and blunders at a player level happen at all the clubs. No one is a saint. You have crazy characters and thugs in all teams. To take such individual examples is an unfortunate deviation from the topic. What matters when talking about the ‘modelness’ of a club is, how strategic they are, what vision and aspirations they have and how well they set out to achieve them. From that perspective, they are certainly a model club.
Ferreira has been a defensive liability over the length of the season. I can think of at least two or three games where his poor positioning and lack of tackling have cost Chelsea goals and the match.
He’s just a very weak defender. Birmingham City showed little attacking flair and never really troubled him, it’s true. But throw him in against Christian Bale and watch his head spin.
I agree, there’s a lot to admire about Manchester United.
I envy their large stadium and how they fill it.
But there’s really only one thing standing between Manchester United and Newcastle United. And that’s Sir Alex Ferguson. Fundamentally you need to be successful at football in order to sustain your overall success.
And Ferguson really is one of the best ever at assembling and managing a squad.
A model is something you can use as a blueprint for success. But you can’t emulate Alex Ferguson. He’s a one-off wonder.
If I had to go up against Batman my head would be spinning too!
Yeah, I’m curious what will become of United when Ferguson eventually goes. There are rumors Mourinho will manage the club, but I think Fergie might make a push for a United man to replace him. I wonder if they’ll appoint a new manager a year or two before Fergie leaves and have that manager serve as an assistant during a tranistion stage. Whatever happens, I’m sure Fergie will demand that the new manager share his overall philosophy on club governance and management, and I’m not sure Mourinho is that man.
Partly agree. Man Utd were a very successful club (next to Liverpool) even before Sir Alex joined them. Man Utd as a club always had lot more ambition and aspiration than a Newcastle United (I know it’s only an example) ever had. They had a vision and shared it with a manager that would help them take them forward. I doubt very much if a Newcastle has that. So it’s not only about Sir Alex, though he made it all a lot easier for them. While Sir Alex was doing his magic, the board have done a great job in making Man Utd a top brand across the world.
Also, respects to Man Utd administration to have stuck with Sir Alex and all his decisions throughout his time. It took five seasons for him to win the title. He made some very controversial decisions all along. They always stood by him. This is all despite the changes in club administration – different chairmen, different board and different owners. That’s an admirable thing.
If Sir Alex had joined Newcastle United in 1986, would Newcastle Utd have now been half as successful as Man Utd? I doubt. That’s because Man Utd is a more mature organisation than many of the other clubs.
Mate! That’s off topic. Did Ferreira have a good game or not against Birmingham City? Yes. Why do we talk about him being a weak defender, him having cost goals, what would happen to him against Bale? Irrelevant honestly. Against Birmingham, on that night, in those 90 minutes, he had a good game.
Rors21,
Whoever it is, he’s not going to last 25 years like Sir Alex. I wonder what would be the longest tenure of the managers going forward. Would we even see someone doing 10 years at a club? Jose may not see Man Utd as a challenge. Whatever can be won at Man Utd has been won there and they have been mightily successful in the last 10-12 years. Man City would interest him.
I wonder too. Clearly Mourinho wants the job.
My sense is that while United and Ferguson (synonymous) admire Mourinho’s success, they don’t think his preferred playing style is a good fit for Manchester United.
Ferguson, and Matt Busby before him, set a standard for attacking flair that has come to define the club’s style.
Mourinho has a very clear football philosophy. And it’s based on strong defense, not attacking flair. Nothing wrong with that, it’s a highly effective style. But I don’t think it would sit well at Old Trafford.
You could argue that Real Madrid have the same culture as United when it comes to playing style and hired Mourinho anyway. But unlike Madrid, United continue to enjoy success and probably won’t feel the need to compromise their values in order to win trophies.
Of course, they might change their attitude if they go winless for a few years after Ferguson quits.
Scratching my head here.
When did I say Ferriera played poorly against Birmingham City?
wxwax,
The Jose Mourinho that we have seen is the one that has always worked at clubs that are hungry for success. At Chelsea, he had to deliver trophies. Same at Inter. Same at Madrid. The side of Mourinho that we have seen is the one that delivers trophies. Fundamentally, he’s a very intelligent man and knows better than most on how to use his resources, how to get the best out of his players’ strengths and the opponents’ weaknesses.
We are seeing how the MYTH around Mourinho’s brand of football is being crushed at Madrid. This season, Real Madrid has played some breathtaking football, definitely not in the Barca style, but very similar to Man Utd style. JM would do just well at Man Utd but I don’t think he’d go there. I hope he doesn’t.
Ha Ha Ha! I don’t know. I just picked it up from the conversation! Thought let me stick it in :)
Holiday today. Without some football to watch, it all too dull. Lots of interesting matches tomorrow. Thinking of watching the 2009/10 season review DVD and the 04/05 and 05/06 too.
I think it’s easy to forget that Manchester United had a rough 16 years between Busy and Ferguson.
They were relegated once and were in danger of being relegated two other times. They won 3 FA Cups but never the First Division.
Without Alex Ferguson, the brand that is Manchester United as we know it would probably have never been created. There was nothing inevitable about it. They owe that man an awful lot. Whoever replaces him will have a thankless job and probably won’t be there long. That’s how it is when it comes to replacing legends.
Ha! :)
I also hope he doesn’t.
But he seems to have developed a fetish for managing Europe’s top clubs. And he demands resources. United are the only club in England that fit the description. It’s almost embarrassing how he’s lobbied for the job.
However, I don’t think the timing will work out for him, not in the short term at least. Ferguson fears he’ll die as soon as he quits. So I see him hanging on for perhaps another 10 years. Or until he’s either dead or senile.
wxwax,
True. Man Utd owes Sir Alex an awful lot. My point though was that the Man Utd administration played a massive role in creating the Man Utd brand and Sir Alex absolutely made a big contribution to it. Without him, they might have done the same things but would not have been as successful if they hadn’t found someone like Sir Alex. In the age of internet, youtube and social networking, it’s easier to create and maintain your brands. Chelsea has been a big beneficiary too. Man Utd were a big brand worldwide even in the 90s.
The best thing they did was (a) to find the right guy (b) to stick with him. Most clubs could do only either of these. Hence my respect to Man Utd’s board.
wxwax,
He demands resources for sure because he builds a team that lasts the test of time. The Chelsea squad he built won titles even last season. His Inter squad is very strong and capable though they’re not doing well now. Real Madrid’s squad for instance, would serve them well for many seasons. So he will demand whatever it takes for him to deliver his expectations. Very fair. I’d do that same at my office :)
Man City has the resources and he can absolutely go there for his next project. He might win a title or two but will get booted out by the Sheikhs for some reason or the other. At Man Utd, he could start another successful period for them.
Btw, I hadn’t known about his lobbying for the Utd job. Did he?
True. He’s not going to rest until he wins a champions league for Real Madrid and one from the English league. But I’d like to see him manage a club like, say Tottenham or Valencia or Napoli. I want to see how far he can take them. Not to prove a point. Just out of curiosity.
Very true. He had a rough start to his tenure and they gave him a chance.
He’s dropped a bunch of hints. This is perhaps the most forthright he’s been.
“I would consider going to Manchester United but United have to consider if they want me to succeed Sir Alex Ferguson. f they do, then of course.”
The quote is from The Independent. If I add the link this post gets sent to moderation quarantine.
My respect for JM has multiplied by infinity. And i feel myself too tiny to comment anything on him. May he choose Chelsea, may he choose Manures, i would respect him equally. Some people have strong enough personality to go beyond rivalry and boundaries and JM is one of them. All Hail JM! The best sportsman of my lifetime till now and i´m sure for days to come!
Ah I see. Would have been a response to the question “would you consider managing Man Utd?”. Typical journo question.
Aasim,
No, they fired him because he spent over 200m on players and lost everything and a better manager was willing to come to Real Madrid. He has won 1 title so far.
Yeah, it’s tough to have a lot of longevity these days. Aside from Fergie, David Moyes and Arsene Wenger, nobody sticks around for long. The pressure to succeed instantly and constantly is too much to bear for club owners….and you know what, it makes sense. The stakes are too high, the money too big and the competition too fierce. Although I prefer the luxury of giving a manager years to implement his strategy and vision, that’s just plain whimsical. You either succeed or get out.
Some rumors are flying around saying Rafa Benitez is interested in the Chelsea job. Should Carlo go, I don’t think Rafa is a bad replacement. I know, I know, he crashed spectacularly at Liverpool and Inter. He’s seems stubborn and pompous. And he blows up at rivals in the press, which is a sign of a nutter.
But the job he did in winning the Champions League in ’05 was stunning. That Liverpool team was mediocre, in and out. But they ended up winning, all the more impressive given their striker corp was only slightly better than what you see at Scunthorpe United on any given Saturday.
That victory was preceded by Uefa Cup success at Valencia. So I don’t care what you say about the man, he can flat out coach.
Plus, he knows how to get the best out of Fernando Torres. If we’re serious about remodeling our attack around Torres, there’s no better man to lead the charge than Rafa.
Having said all of that, I still hope Carlo stays.
If this happens I’ll collapse and go into coma.
WXWAX – You might then have run the blog all by yourself.
@ Tremayne mate 96 points are the best real have ever achieved in Laliga but prob was that Barca finished with 99
Just six points behind Manchester United and with Chelsea to visit Old Trafford and Man U to visit Emirates this title is still open. We might have a situation where all three teams end up on same points… in such a scenario GD comes into picture..Chelsea are currently lagging and I think today’s game is our chance to not only close the gap but improve our goal difference..
Yes, Chelsea vs West ham is not a easy game but Chelsea should go with a attacking line up..have Torres as well..he has a had a good run against West ham…Chelsea should win this by 4-0 if not more..
Its Chelsea vs West Ham. Its Carlo Ancelotti vs Avram Grant, John Terry vs Scott Parker
Catch all the latest team news, match preview, pre-match interviews & analysis and LIVE match Streaming later ahead at http://www.thechelseafc.com
Aasim, You can’t expect to meet the challenges of today with yesterday’s tools and expect to be in business tommorow. Cheers!
Marcel Desailly issues a statement stating that ”Sir Alex Ferguson and his mean are unstoppable ahead of the semi-final clash between Manchester United FC and FC Schalke”. This man has constantly criticized Chelsea’s ways whilst always praising our opposition, be it Arsenal’s ”fantastic youth policy” or United’s ”die-hard attitude”.
I’ve always disliked some of our ‘past heroes’ and ‘legends of the club’ as they are to come out and be excessively critical of our ways every single time whilst never hesitating on praising any of our title rivals (Arsenal aside, hahaha). It’s sickening given the longevity of their relationship with their clubs. Ever heard any of the United or Liverpool legends saying anything against these clubs ?
KTBFFH !!
On today’s game, this should be our line-up:
———————————————-Cech—————————————————
–Ivanovic—————–D. Luiz————————-John Terry—————–A. Cole–
————–Essien———————Mikel———————–Lampard———————
——-S.Kalou—————————Drogba———————–Malouda——————
I have a feeling though that an experimental switch to start Torres instead of Drogba will take place. This may make-or-break our season. If Torres scores early up, things might change for him. Otherwise, a goal-drought continuation might mean Drogba would have about 45 minutes to make an influence and that could be risky. I say start Drogba, get a 3-0 lead in the first-half and then rotate as much as you like.
I have a feeling we may win big tonight.
KTBFFH !!
All going as per our plan so far! Man Utd are still 0-0 after an hour!
That ”chick” is the buy of the season.
Lampard and the Blues.,
Definitely. How may winners he s scored… Damn…
Lampard and the Blues., I don’t think anyone with a sound mind recognizes Macel Desailly as a legend or hero. Any club can have an excellent youth policy. Its just that there aren’t any exceptional coaches in the world. Me personally, I think that Jose Mourinho, Arsene Wenger and Alex Ferugson is over-rated. Buts that’s another story, for anther time. Cheers!
Marks, I’ve found this James Meek article as he is a well respected journalist. I hope that you get to read it and enjoy it.
The £140m Roman Abramovich is using to bail out Chelsea FC is loose change to Russia’s second-richest man. But how did he get it? And how did he come to own so much of his country’s oil at the tender age of 36?
In Anadyr, capital of Chukotka, the walls are plastered with pathetic hand-written adverts from people wanting to sell their flats. The sellers write their phone numbers on little strips which buyers are supposed to tear off. There is little tearing off, although the sellers are realistic. A few hundred dollars is a typical price for a small flat. Anadyr is the first bit of Russia you would come to if you crossed the Bering Strait from Alaska and it is a desperately cold, bleak, tumbledown place, its people afflicted by disease and alcoholism. Many would do anything to be able to leave. Fourteen hours flying time to the west, in Fulham, home of Chelsea Football Club, the residents do not need to paste their for-sale signs on the walls. For the price of a one-room apartment in Fulham you could buy entire quarters of Anadyr.
Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich, the second-richest man in Russia and one of the wealthiest men in Europe, is now in the unique position of owning property in both districts. He is governor of Chukotka, and new owner of Chelsea Football Club. In taking control of Chelsea, he has affected a breathtaking transfer of cash from his impoverished native country to one of the richest parts of a rich country. His bid for the club is not illegal; the amount involved, £140m, is small change to a billionaire. But that money is money earned from businesses privatised in opaque deals in the Yeltsin era, deals which make Britain’s privatisation fat cats look like lean models of self-denial by comparison.
Abramovich is a powerful and mysterious figure in Russia; the power and the mystery feed off each other. Little is known about his personal life, his origins, his motives, or his likes and dislikes. He rarely gives interviews. Scarcely any TV footage exists of him. Courageous Russian journalists have written highly critical articles raising a series of questions about his labyrinthine business activities, yet, as so often in the strange limbo of post-Soviet press freedom, their outrage echoes and fades. Abramovich knows that, like all the most powerful Russian businessmen, the “oligarchs”, he is untouchable – unless he angers President Vladimir Putin, in which case he could find himself in prison the next day. (continued)
The new owner of the Blues was born on October 24 1966 in Saratov, a city on the Volga. When he was still a baby, his parents died and he was adopted by his paternal uncle, a senior official in the Soviet oil industry. The boy grew up with his new family in Komi, an oil-bearing region in Siberia.
As the Soviet monolith began to tremble in the mid-80s, Abramovich went to study at the Gubkin oil and gas institute in Moscow. What course he followed next is unknown, but two things seem certain: he used his hometown contacts to the full, and he saw early on how it was possible to become extremely rich extremely fast by exploiting the hybrid laws of the Gorbachev-Yeltsin transition, which allowed companies to trade on the huge difference between Soviet and western prices for raw materials. Most Russians were too naive or too fastidious to try to understand what was going on; the field was open for the bold few.
According to Alexei Mukhin’s Oligarchs of Russia, a kind of bird-spotters guide to tycoons, Abramovich made his first money in the early 90s with a tyre business in Moscow. In 1992, a criminal case was opened against him over the fact that 55 rail cars full of diesel fuel, ordered by a firm for delivery to the Russian capital, somehow ended up in Latvia. The criminal investigation was transferred from Moscow to Abramovich’s home town of Ukhta where it was later dropped.
Having mastered the art of forming companies and dealing with cross-border trade, Abramovich’s businesses grew in number and complexity. He began to operate internationally, setting up a company in Switzerland, Runicom. His mentor was Boris Berezovsky, the former mathematician who wormed his way into the confidences of the Yeltsin family and its inner circle through his gossiping skills, his ability to find well-paid jobs for his friends, and his style of coming up with imaginative financial ideas – like selling Russian state TV to Yeltsin’s allies – to make political problems go away. (continued)
It was Berezovsky who partnered Abramovich in the deal which was to catapult him from Komi into the ranks of the mega-rich. In 1995, Berezovsky persuaded the Yeltsin administration to create a new company from some of the choicest parts of the old Soviet oil industry and sell it to him and Abramovich – at that time, a name unknown to the public – in a cosy auction for a mere $110m.
Within a few years, the company’s real worth – billions – became apparent. In the late-90s, as Berezovsky’s influence waned and Abramovich’s waxed, Abramovich came to wield more power over the firm, and began to expand into the vacuum left by Berezovsky, snapping up stakes in Russian television, in Aeroflot and the Russian aluminium industry.
The web of ownership behind which Abramovich sits is fantastically complex. Companies are nested within companies within companies, many of them outside Russia. At present his interests are largely controlled by a British-registered holding company, Millhouse.
He has been skilled in avoiding dirtying his own hands despite taking over the reins of some extremely murky enterprises. His move into aluminium, for instance, was seen as closing the period of the “aluminium wars”, which saw murders and arrests and countless accusations of corruption during the struggle for control of smelters. He took over ORT, the privatised Russian public television, long after the mysterious murder of its popular head, Vlad Listyev. But if Abramovich has flourished in Putin’s Russia because he does not break the law, Putin has no problem with his favourites becoming rich.
A single example shows the extent to which Abramovich has been able to legally and openly plunder the privatised oil industry. In May, Sibneft’s board considered how it should divide up the company’s massive profit of $1.1bn for 2002. How much should the shareholders get in dividends, and how much should be ploughed back into the business? The answer: all but a token $100m would go to the shareholders. Since Abramovich owns 44% of the company, he receives a cool $480m in dividends for past year, from a company he did little to create. He also stands to gain a huge slice of another $3bn being paid to Sibneft shareholders by a second oligarch-owned oil company, Yukos, which is buying Sibneft. It is not surprising Abramovich is buying Chelsea. It is surprising he is not buying Real Madrid, Manchester United and Juventus. This is not money Abramovich has borrowed; it is real money from his pocket, which could be spent in Russia, and will not be spent in Russia. (continued)
Abramovich lives regally in a vast estate beyond Moscow’s outer ring road. His compound lies in a heavily guarded area which used to be strictly off limits because Leonid Brezhnev and other senior party officials had their dachas there. Now it is in a heavily guarded area which is strictly off limits to the Russian public because the new wealthy live there.
He lives with his second wife and their three children. In snippets gleaned from rare interviews it has emerged that he has two yachts, he likes Chinese food, films such as Straw Dogs and Pulp Fiction, and the music of a Russian band called Spleen.
He is not associated with any particular Russian football club, although there has been a trend in the former Soviet Union for tycoons to pick up obscure Russian and Ukrainian clubs and create teams of expensive players who flare briefly and then disappear.
It is easier to understand why Abramovich might want to buy Chelsea, as a going concern, than to understand why he became governor of Chukotka. Bisected by the Arctic Circle, Chukotka has little going for it except reindeer, some very hard-to-extract gold and an old nuclear power station.
The Chukchis, the native inhabitants, have for decades been the subject of jokes in Russia as supposedly the most dimwitted of all the country’s native peoples. One joke referred to how it was no longer politically correct to make jokes about the Chukchis, and in all future jokes “Chukchi” would be substituted by the phrase “a certain Jewish reindeer herder”. When Abramovich, who is Jewish, appeared in their territory, scattering dollars in a series of well-judged Robin Hood-like stunts to win election, it is no wonder that he appeared to locals like some mythical character come to life.
Londoners may be tempted to see Abramovich through the same distorted glass of their own preconceptions, as some street bruiser who muscled in on his billions. Yet the truth is probably more uncomfortable still; that despite page after page of unanswered questions about the origins and nature of his wealth, he cannot be pinned down as ever having done anything illegal, and that he has been able to take hundreds of millions of dollars out of Russia in full public view, with the blessing of his president. He will, with his shyness, probably prefer some discreet private box, but if they ever spot him on the terraces, fans of rival clubs might care to indulge in the following Russian chant: “At kooda dyengi?” “Where’s the money from?” (The end).
BlueChampion, I’m sorry that this article took up so huge. But this was a brilliant article about Roman Abramovich when he first arrived to the UK. It made me and I hope other people laugh. I hope that Marks get to read this about his imfamous compatriot it as it makes for compelling reading. Sorry again mate, Cheers!
What a first goal does to a player’s attitude is unbelievable. You could see Torres running around with more enthusiasm and desire as soon as he put the ball into the back of the net. Had Malouda played a one-two with Torres (rather than finish outstandingly for our third), we would’ve seen Torres grab a brace, without a doubt.
This still doesn’t change much though as far as team selection is concerned. Drogba still deserves a place in the starting XI. What we do know now is that Torres can be that super-sub we all know he has the ability to be with his eye for goal for the remainder of the season.
I expect Arsenal to drop points against Bolton. That means the most to us as far as the title race is concerned; it means we can be second comfortably and also gives Arsenal more reason to be lethal against United at the Emirates to prove a point. It’s going to be an interesting end to the season !
KTBFFH !!
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/03/russia.football Saves a lot of blog space this way
Why does Michael have a racy picture of David Beckham posing for Armani?
I think that this is the funniest picture of a football player, that I’ve seen for a long time. Cheers!
Michael,
I too find it funny but at the same time gay because you’re a guy lol.
Why don’t you talk about the match. Why call me gay? Talk about the match. Cheers!
Tremayne Craigg, I didn’t know that this underwear was “Armani”. How buddy did you know that this brand of underwear was Armani lol. Cheers!
The notion that Chelsea would go into some sort of apocalpyse if Rafa is appointed manager is just silly. The man has some serious flaws, no doubt, but he’s the strongest realistic candidate for the position should Carlo be canned. And no, Mourinho and Hiddink are not serious candidates.
What other candidate has his record of success in the Champions League? What other candidate did more with less than him – aka – no strikers worth half a penny in ’05? What other candidate knows the rigors of the Premier League and consequently suceeded? Van Basten, Rijkaard, Hughes, Lippi? Please. The no-name coach of Porto? Come on.
This article has to be the most commented on on BC!