A rare sight — Lampard scores
Let’s start by agreeing that scoring a goal is the hardest thing to do in football.
It’s a lot harder than stopping goals. It’s not an accident that top strikers always earn more than top goalkeepers.
Because scoring goals is so hard, the men who do it often are worth more than their weight in gold. A lot more.
Fernando Torres was sold for £50 million. Cristiano Ronaldo fetched £80 million. Even Dmitar Berbatov was deemed to be worth £30 million and Andy Carroll £35 million.
Scoring goals is hard. It’s valuable. And not just anyone can do it.
This looks hard, but it's easier than scoring
Agreed?
Now let’s agree on a second thing.
Chelsea are struggling this season in large part because they’re not scoring goals like they did last season.
After 26 matches this season, Chelsea have scored 46 goals. That’s 15 fewer than they’d scored at this point in the last campaign.
Chelsea are scoring at a rate of 1.8 goals per match. That’s a whopping 0.9 fewer goals per game. Almost a goal a game difference. A staggering difference.
Where have the goals gone?
Sick of not scoring
Easy. They vanished into Frank Lampard’s groin and hamstring muscles and Didier Drogba’s malaria medication.
The two men had career years last season. Neither man will ever score as many goals in a single season again. Drogba knocked-in a Golden Boot’s worth of 29. Lampard chased him all year to tally 22.
How good was that? For Drogba, 9 more than ever before. An astonishing average of 0.9 goals a match. That’s right, almost a goal for every time he stepped onto a Premier League pitch. By comparison, his career average is 0.49, a little less than a goal every two games. So 2009-10 was the best year of his life, by a wide margin.
Frank Lampard’s 22 Premier League goals were 6 better than his previous best and 9 better than his third-best season. His scoring average was 0.6, more than twice as good as his career average of 0.28.
So Drogba had a career year. Lampard had a career year. Chelsea scored 103. Had a league-leading goal differential of 71.
And yet they still couldn’t clinch the Premier League title until the very last game of the season.
Fast forward to this season.
Drogba has 9 goals. His average is a relatively anemic 0.38 per match. Lampard’s even worse. He’s only played 11 matches and tallied a woeful 3 times. We all know the reasons why.
So that’s where the goals have gone.
With the Big Two slumping, is it possible that the missing goals can be coaxed out of the rest of the squad?
He can't carry the team
Let’s look at their goal totals and their career averages to see if that’s a reasonable expectation.
Nicolas Anelka has scored 6 times so far, an average of 0.27. Last season he put away 11 at a clip of 0.33. (His best season ever was 19 goals, in 2008-2009 at an average of 0.5 per match.) So Anelka is not scoring well either. But if he were scoring at the same rate as last season he’d only have tallied 2 more goals at the most. That still leaves a lot of goals on the table.
The rest of Chelsea’s scorers are actually getting goals at rates above their career averages.
Malouda already has 9 goals. Last year he had 12 for the entire campaign (his best season ever.) His current average is 0.36, the same as last year and above his career average of 0.26. His previous best year was 6 goals in 2007-08.
Kalou has 7 goals in 21 matches, a .33 average that’s above his career average of 0.24. Last season he only netted 5 at 0.22. His best season ever is 7 goals, in ’07-’08 and ’08-’09.
Those are Chelsea’s top five scorers from last season. Essien is the only other goals candidate, and his career-best is 6 (he has 3 so far.)
Given these numbers, it’s hard to see where there are another 15 goals on the current Chelsea squad.
Which makes sense.
As we agreed at the beginning, scoring goals is hard. Only a few gifted men do it with regularity. Chelsea is lucky to have two of them. But they’re both having awful seasons due to sickness and injury.
Embracing a new scorer
So if you want to understand why Chelsea is struggling, look to the goals total.
It also explains why Roman Abramovich thinks it’s worth spending 50 million pounds to buy another of those rare creatures… the consistent goal scorer.




Great analysis…let’s hope that Lampsy and Drogba wear their scoring boots again!
i think you have it all back to front…goals come as a result of good teamwork which over a sustained periods breaks teams down physically which then leads to goals…when we wre were bashing teams 7 zip the teamwork was outstanding…the winning mentality or motivation to go the extra mile was evident and opponents were run off their feet to the point where goals were inevitable based on the law of averages..the more attempts the greater likelehood of one going in…..they dried up because the teamwork is nowhere at the same level…yes we keep position but most of those passes allow opponents to regroup..look at the masters of possession Barcelona and it’s all got a sharp edge and threatening towards goal…for whatever the reason the fight we had has greatly diminished…and not being flexibale enough in games to change style has hurt us as well…we all know computer novices who will hit the same button getting the same result and hoping that on the 20th hit..a new result will magically appear…in football the smart coaches adapt to the circumstances..so provide all those things we will start smashing teams again 7 zip…
You’re bang on right!
They can still get back to the 6-0 form if they just instill the “we can do it because we are the champions” belief!
A win against united will guarantee that.
Lets hope for the best!
KTBFFH
I completely agree with this post. It makes me wonder who the real Drogba is. Clearly he’s not as bad as he’s playing now and he’s not as good as he was last year. But two years ago he was so-so and it makes me concerned that this season is closer to the real self than last year.
Also, this article shows how silly it is to trust one player for the offense. If that said player gets hurt or gets malaria then the offense stalls. I know Torres is technically now one of four talented scorers (Drogba, Anelka and Lampard) but I think putting all our hopes onto him is the same mistake that we made this year. If Chelsea could have instead purchased Dzeko and Hamsik (27+ 25 = 52) they’d have the extra striker to rotate in with Drogba and Anelka that they wanted with Torres AND an attacking forward that could rotate in with Lampard and Malouda. I’m just saying the point of this post is to not put all your eggs in one basket and Chelsea did exactly that again with Torres.
I was wondering if someone could look at Ashely Cole’s performance last year and the begging of this year and compare it to his performance since our slump started. He just seems less confident (lot’s of missing the goal on open shots) and more willing to sit back and not play 1/2 the game in front of Malouda. I don’t know if it’s coaching or it other teams put someone like Eboue at RW just to press Cole but I think Cole’s drop in performance is just as critical. Maybe without Mikel playing worse this year Cole is less likely to trust Mikel and the CBs this year than last year. I just think someone should look at this.
Thanks. Great article.
Good one there WXWAX. While you talk about about what went wrong, I’m keen to evaluate what was our response to these situations? If you take Drogba and Lampard out of this Chelsea team, are we not value for a top four finish?
BC, I don’t think this squad, minus Drogba and Lampard, is good enough for a top 4 finish. That leaves only Anelka as a proven scorer. And as we’ve seen, it leaves a giant hole in midfield as well.
Whatever happens in the summer, I hope it includes keeping Sturridge and giving him some chances. I’d be quite upset if they transferred him.
Keith, I didn’t include Ashley Cole because he only scores a handful of goals a season. His value is creating chances for others and it’s hard to quantify that, although obviously assists are down this season along with the lower goal total.
I think we all agree that Cole is one of the veterans who is not playing at the top of his game.
I know he has a chronic ankle injury. And he’s played almost every game, so he might be excused if he’s worn out.
Trisdin, you’re absolutely right that goals come from teamwork. And clearly Chelsea are not performing well as a team.
However, the central premise of the post is that regardless of how well a team is playing, you can’t stick just anyone upfront and expect a goal.
Goal scorers are a rare breed. Take your example of Barca. Subtract one player… Lionel Messi and his 30+ goals. Would they win La Liga or the CL? I don’t believe so. They wouldn’t even be competitive, I suspect. They’d become Arsenal, pretty but often toothless.
Same for Madrid without Ronaldo. Or Milan without Ibra.
The men who score goals are hard to find. And Chelsea has lost not one, but two prolific scorers.
That’s an almost impossible obstacle to overcome.
Wxwax,
I don’t agree mate. This squad minus Drogba and Lampard can easily finish in top 4. Take any two players out of the Man Utd squad, Fergie can easily get them in top 4. No van Persie and no Fabregas – Wenger has always kept Arsenal in top 4.
Ignoring the danish game the service in the last 4 months to whoever was up front was very average…
Wymax…..you said: “However, the central premise of the post is that regardless of how well a team is playing, you can’t stick just anyone upfront and expect a goal….” well that point is a given with all teams but I have 2 points…
1 if you take lamps and drogs it’s hardly that they have been missing open goals each week which tells us maybe they are not having the same opportunities…and so without them banging in 40 goals a season we are gone.
2 Last year when we won look at the large numbers of players who scored goals which all adds up to a teams success as if a team relies on just one scorer then that team is easily shut down
I think if you take out any quality player out of team of course it will suffer which then becomes another given…..we have are proven goal scorers in lamps and drogs and anelka who have been playing in a team which has lost it’s way….and what we haven’t got is that one player who in a moment of brilliance can turn a match…they don’t have to score 40 odd goals just the important ones and at important times…..like Ronaldo in his last year at united…look at the games where they were losing or going towards a draw…and along he would come and create brilliance…as they had the simple tactic of the other 10 players just passing to one man..him….another recent example our first goal against the danes…danish gift pass to anelka…which basically puts him in the clear and bing bang boom ..GOAL…..when was the aslt time you saw a decent cross into the box from bosingwa or cole?
If you removed Giggs and Berbatov, United would struggle to make the top 4 with their current squad.
Berbatov has scored 19 goals in the Premier league this season. United would collapse without him. With all due respect to Nani, Giggs is the most dangerous midfielder on their team. The man is 37 years old and yet Alex Ferguson has to play him a lot because without him, United’s attack breaks down.
United’s midfield is in dismal shape. That’s why Giggs and 36 year old Paul Scholes are still United’s mainstays.
As for Arsenal, the one thing they have is a deep squad. Chelsea don’t.
That’s a critical difference when you posit removing last season’s top two scorers. Chelsea’s squad is thin, injured and out of form. It simply can’t afford to lose a Drogba and a Lampard.
I agree completely, mate. No question Chelsea haven’t had many of those moments of brilliance this season.
If I recall correctly, the wonder goals have come from a thunderous Alex free kick, a Zhirkov miracle strike from distance and a dipping Drogba stunner from 35 yards. Now look at how many games those particular players have either missed completely or played at a lesser level due to sickness.
It’s the story of this season, really. I think they handed Ancelotti a thin squad which was barely competitive and then watched it be decimated by age, injury, illness and loss of form.
Long gone are the days when Chelsea had two starters at every position.
Great article, I liked It
Yes, we having been lacking a player or players who can take the game by the scruff of the neck and give it a big shake…someone who really inspires the others with their brilliance or sometimes even with effort…Ronaldo did it with goals out of nothing when united were in all sorts of trouble..or think of the effort example…Tevez when he was going to get booted from united in his last season and he was making 50 metre runs one after the other in defense to harass defenders working hard for his team…no, he had no chance to make the tackle but he was willing to go the extra mile…and then the fans would applaud him for his team…his team mates had to get a big lift from stuff like that…it’s the inspiring efforts we have lacked for whatever reason…on the shopping list for next year we need a big personality with an onfield presence to fire up the players and put some fire in their bellies as if we want to have ongoing success like the uniteds and liverpools had year after year then losing is not an option or putting in less than 110% each week and if you don’t have that commitment then you get flicked with only players who fight for the cause no matter what the score can stay…we really need to put the microscope on each player now and see who has the fire to stay
Getting back my laptop tomorrow woooh! By the way, it is amazing what you guys expect from men who are way past their prime. In the TSO days they were the shiznit but unfortunately we don’t have the tactician, translator or motivator with us anymore and I don’t mean Guus or Jose. I mean Ray. So they finally drop to what they should be performing to. Get back Ray and I guarantee you we will be back better than ever. Don’t get me wrong though and criticise me for blaming the slump on Ray and crap. Chelsea are beatable just like Barcelona. I know how to beat Barcelona, Guus knows how, Jose knows how (don’t mention the 5-0 as Real are very poor at Camp Nou and the team weren’t responding to Jose during that match, they were playing like wild animals, spoiled brats never lost anything, no offence to C Ronaldo). Chelsea are simple to beat as are the other teams. Don’t get me wrong. Teams know how to beat everyone, but when it comes to motivation that is where wins and losses happen. Chelsea with Ray were always motivated and ready to give 110% even if they were winning 10-0 by halftime. Without a motivator like him, we simply kick a ball around for 90 minutes.
By the way Man Utd
4-4-2 (left to right)
Cech
A Cole – Terry – Luiz – Ivanovic
*McEachran – Lampard – Essien – Ramires
Torres – Anelka
Not enough time to make it sexy
Johan put a DM in Pep on RM and it worked. Damn sure Carlo can put a CM on LM. Reason I put him there is because he has creativity and 99% he plays we get double the chances. He deserves a start after working so hard in the reserves and showing his quality every time he has been given a chance. Also I am not sure because I missed the Copenhagen match but I think Malouda is off form.
On goal scorers..my assessment
Drogs great but is he on the way out ?…yes or no… we need a replacement now and a proven one and did we rely tooo much on him when he was firing rockets
Torress..a potentiall match winner of world class ability…drogs natural replacement though he has the curse of shevechenko on his shoulders
Anelka is a proven scorer in the premier league and looking at where he has played positionally lately is doing a good job..though does his best work when his contract could be in jeopardy.
Kalou specialises in missing easy opportunites which for my liking happens a lot and has been attempted to made from a central striker where he played originally into a winger..which could be a very long term project or as scolari mentioned the boy could not dribble until he got specialist training in that area. (think Neymay in the future)
Malouda has been getting better from when he came to us on the goal front but again seems to have gone into hibernation.
Lamps.. a proven goal scorer year in year out and since his comeback has been on the unlucky side as has had lots of shots with centremetres in many of them…and on other days a lesser shot would have gone in….but unfortunately for us is not getting younger..if he has a son I would sign him up now!
Tremayne Craigg I agree 100%..read this “I would have killed for Jose Mourinho, for the motivation he gave me and for how he used to stimulate me. With the other [Guardiola] there was football, but a coach must adapt his play to suit the players, especially after spending €70 million on one…..Zlatan Ibrahimovic a players persepective and what we have seen week in week out…either some can’t do it anymore or they are not motivated to do it…..in the premier league how often did united win in the final minutes or injury time…heaps..yes it’s down to many things and one is the will to fight all the way till the very end and then a bit more if need be…one thing for ferguson is that his teams do not have slackers as he gives them the flick very quickly…
whereas we sort of reward them with even more game time…
Cech
Bosingwa – Terry – Ivanovic – Cole
Essien – Lampard – Luiz – Ramires
Torres – Anelka
I’s put luiz in as holding m as he can be more effective in bringing the ball out as since we lost claude m…we find it hard to launch swift counters…also he is very fast giving us plenty of cover in front for their full backs
Do not concentrate on number of goals … Trapatoni says “A winner is not the one with good strikers, it is the one with good defenders” …
No way mate. Totally disagree. It doesn’t work like that. You say United would collapse without Berba. If Berba wasn’t available, United will not collapse. Fergie would have used Hernandez. He would not be scared to use Hernandez. With a weak squad like the Utd’s one, Fergie is leading the pack by 12 points. If Fergie were to manage this Chelsea team, I bet he would be topping the table. Period. And if Carlo were to manage this Utd squad – I leave it to your guess.
As regards Arsenal, you’re the first one to talk about the ‘squad depth’ at Arsenal. That’s an illusion. Arsenal’s squad is the weakest of the top four. Arsenal have used 20 players this season while Chelsea have used 19 players. What squad depth?
Well, not all squad members are created equal. Just because someone’s played for Chelsea this season, it doesn’t mean they’re a reliable every day player.
Among the players Chelsea have used this season:
* “goal-a-game” Bruma
* Patrick van Aanholt for what, two games?
* 19 year-old Gael Kakuta
* 17 year-old Josh McEachran
* Yossi Benayoun, not seen since October
* Yuri Zhirkov, absent since what, November?
That’s six players who are either too young or injured to be considered full members of the squad. And I’m not even including the months missed by Lampard. So I feel that that number you cite is a bit misleading.
Hernandez has certainly had his moments this season. But he’s no Berbatov. If he were, he’d be playing more. Players aren’t interchangeable. That’s why the really good ones get paid so much and cost so much.
WXWAX,
That’s my very point. We have not used our resources properly and claim that they are not ready. When will they be ready? When they are used. That’s what Fergie does. We have been too conservative. We have been too afraid to make changes. We are paying the price. No problem with the squad.
good write up mate…and i love how u and BC are going at each other…..KTBFFH
It is not easy my friend