Chelsea 1-0 Roma | The Return of John Terry?
When the match was nearing the one-hour mark, I was just thinking that this was John Terry’s best match for many months. And this happened in a match where Carvalho also played. Terry was in a very positive frame of mind. He made those crunching tackles, crucial interceptions and even made some interesting runs. But I didn’t think he could get the man of the match award ahead of Mikel. And then came his fantastic header. The header was very reminiscent of his tremendous winner which was Chelsea’s amazing fourth goal of the match against Barcelona at the Bridge few seasons back.
That’s what happens in football. If you really really play well, everything else will fall in place. It’s no coincidence that Terry score yesterday. He was playing very well indeed and his own performance gave him that confidence in overall game. His good defensive performance is what made him go for that header and win it. How long I’ve been waiting for a John Terry goal! I only hope he picks it up from here and does better. If he is at his very best, I won’t be too worried about anything at all. Man, he can be unbelievable.
The win was very deserved as only Chelsea were going for the win. Roma was hell bent on not getting beaten than anything else. I can’t blame them. After being runner up in the last serie a season, they’ve had a poor start to the season and the coach is under tremendous pressure not to lose again. If you saw Spalletti in the sidelines, it appeared as if he was quite content with the way Roma were playing. It was certainly their strategy to contain Chelsea and frustrate them as much as possible. To their credit, it almost worked out.
There were no surprises in the starting eleven from Scolari. He went for experience everywhere on the pitch more than anything else. I don’t think we were at our best. Roma sitting back also in a way helped us. We were very patient and confident that the goal would come sometime soon. By the 70th minute, I was not overly confident of us scoring a goal because we couldn’t not really break down their attack. Granted they sat back but it was Stamford Bridge and we had put forward a strong team. We did not create too many clear cut chances to be honest. When a top Italian team decides to defend deep, you won’t be able to score that easily.
And we couldn’t break them down because, we were playing the passing game a bit too much. This was a game where a strong centre forward like Drogba would have made a big difference. This was a game where we must have used our long passes to great effect. We were playing along the ground which turned out to be quite advantageous for Roma. As we were relying on the ground/short passes, as Roma lined up at the back, we got only half chances and we did not have someone special up front to convert these half chances into goals. A Fernando Torres would have got one or two yesterday in the flash of a light.
Anelka is too slow to pick up smart slip-ins and loose balls. Good lot of you are saying that his movement was impressive. Remember, he is playing as the lone striker with wingers on either sides. In this set up his role is certainly not to make spaces and draw defenders. That’s what Malouda, Kalou, Lampard and Deco must be doing for him to exploit the space and make a goal. I’m worried that Anelka is not selfish enough or even hungry enough for goals. As Jose once said, strikers live for goals. It is goals and nothing but goals that would satisfy them. Anelka is playmaking and seems to be content with that role. Something needs to change – Anelka or Anelka’s mindset or my mindset on Anelka. I still feel we are awafully light upfront. We’ll never realise that as long as we keep winning.
This was a match where there were not not too many 7/10 rated performances. Mikel was an exception. He would have been my MOTM but for John Terry’s three-pointer. Okay now, just think of Essien’s best days with us. And compare that to Mikel’s best days. I’d have the courage to say that Mikel’s performances are on par or better than Essien’s performances. When Essien would have edge is in the passion that he shows. It’s quite important to have good players who are passionate and expressive. It’s good for the team psyche when the chips are down. When you just take the bread and butter performances of the defensive midfielder role, Essien was a tough act to follow and now when Essien’s back, Mikel would be a tough act to follow.
One other area where Essien was better was in scoring some goals. Mikel has been trying his best to get his name on the scoresheet but has been failing rather miserably. He does not seem to be able to shoot while Essien could score from various ranges and angles. Mikel still has some untapped potential for being a good attacking midfielder too. He has the gift of being able to trap and shield the ball and when he makes a run, the ball looks stuck to his foot. Very useful skills those, if he plays as an attacking midfielder in a slow build up. To sum up this topic, I can confidently say that this Chelsea team is the most versatile team in England (Europe?). We have too many players who can play in more than one position and deliver the goods. Helps in the premier league marathon.
I was saying that there were not too many 7/10 performances this time. That’s true. Lampard, Deco, Malouda, Anelka, Kalou, Bosingwa, Bridge, carvalho and Cech – I wouldn’t give 7/10 for even one of them. Mikel and Terry were the only players who deserved a 7/10. Are we developing some sort of form against those teams that defend deep? We didn’t score against Cluj, we struggled to beat Wigan, we just about drew against Man Utd (yes, they defended deep that day like a freaking relegation battler). When the opponents come out and play, we come up with a fantastic performance and there are 7/10 all around. When they hold the fort, we seem to struggle to break them down. Just think why.
I know you cannot always dominate opponents or you mat not always control all the games. I’m absolutely fine with the positive results. In fact I care more about them than anything else. All that I’m trying to say is that there seems to be a pattern in the way we handle the deep defending teams. We need to work on that pretty soon or else draws are upon us. We might have had 65% possession, 30 shots against opponents 5, but the score line might read 0-0 or 1-1. The way I see it, the problem is with the attack. We need a genuine goal scorer whio has a nose for goals. We need an Inzaghi or something. I’d even take Crespo over Anelka. Good thought?
Let’s shift our focus to the big game this Sunday. No Torres. No Keane. Stamford Bridge. Carvalho & Deco are back. Looks like the result is already for all of us to see. But I won’t underestimate Liverpool. Not even in their worst form. Nevertheless, I’m certainly confident of a positive result. You’d see some delays in the posting of the previews and reviews. These are busy days. Don’t get to sleep much. Anyway, please keep the blog alive even when I’m away.
Por que o Chelsea ganho de 1 x0 da Roma ?
1) O estadio de Stamford Bridge o Campo e Pequeno facilita a Marcação, quando se tem uma Defesa bem ajustada, foi o Caso da Roma, então porque a Roma perdeu de 4 x0 da Inter-(Ita) ? é o seguinte a Roma naquele Jogo estava sem Parte da sua defesa titular Panucci, Mexes, só o Juan Jogou mesmo assim no sacrificio, outra coisa a Roma jogava em casa e Precisa vençer e foi para o ataque correndo risco de levar os contra-ataques perigosos da Inter(Ita) Deu no que deu, já nesse jogo de Quarta a Roma jogou o Tempo todo atrás só no contra golpe não foi um jogo aberto, agora dia 04/11/2008 no Olimpico de Roma a Coisa vai se Diferente a Roma vai ter de vim para cima do Chelsea aí nos vamos veeeeeeeeer, vai ser um Jogo Aberto pode espera vai se jogão !!!
em Inglês por favor
I felt we did a good job against roma. it was blatantly obvious they would go for a draw as they played with all 11 men behind the ball. drogba would have helped a lot in this game with his aerial abilities and strength. anelka didnt manage even 1 shot on goal and that is not okay with me. i read a few comments before where people praised his movement but i felt he was lazy a lot of the team as he would just sit behind the defense and be called for offsides. he should have been making runs instead of standing waiting for the ball.
also malouda’s recent good form was washed away. he is lucky not to have been sent off for that last tackle he had. although i dont even know why he got his first yellow to begin with. surely it wasnt nearly as bad as the one he got away with while only conceding a free kick.
All in all im happy with the three points. now we just need one more win to qualify for the knockout stage. for now though i just hope we can keep the streak alive this weekend against liverpool. keane and torres are both questionable but i think torres is almost definitely going to play. hopefully we can get a couple more players back from injury to help us out.
keep the blue flag flying high fellas
cheers
I think you’re being too harsh on Anelka. As usual. In Scolari’s system, he is employed not as a striker but as a playmaker, creating chances for the midfielders and wingers. You’ve inadvertently described his role exactly-it’s to create space and draw defenders, to allow for delayed runs into the box by the midfield. Scolari used this system for Portugal, and would have done for Brazil had it not been for the absurd talent of Ronaldo. And it’s been fantastic for us this year. You want to bench Anelka, you’ll be cutting off the nose to spite the face.
This tactic obviously doesn’t work as well against a team determined to stifle any and all movement, but you really can’t blame Anelka for that fact. I have a real worry that when Drogba comes back, he’ll be shoehorned into the current system and it’ll be a case of a square peg in a round hole. Drogba isn’t a great passer and doesn’t do as much for other players as Anelka does. The difference is one player gets accolades and attention because it’s his name on the scoresheet, while the other one gets criticism for getting his teammates on but not doing so himself. Anelka is playing very very well for us generally, it’s just not obvious to everyone who watches.
Guess we back to the debate on Anelka vs. Goals vs. Drogba… again. My thought is that Anelka plays similar role to Berbatov without the clinical finishing (which is the REAL problem). His movement and ball holding skill at the edge of the penalty does give us space for the midfielders to shoot. This will only work if there are only 4-5 opposition defending, but when teams like Wigan/Roma plays with 9 behind ball, it is obvious that we are going to struggle with thru balls and ground passing style and rely heavily on set pieces.
Didier on the other hand is a pure out-and-out striker with enough selfishness to test the keeper at any given chance possible which increases the probability of goals. Having said that, I personally thinks that Anelka will play better with the presence of Drogba in the box. But to measure Anelka by number of goals scored will be irrelevant, to be fair; we need to measure him by the total assist/key-passes/+goals. Anelka is a pure FORWARD and not a STRIKER, but with the absents of Drogba, we need a STRIKER more than a FORWARD.
BC, you are right to mention: “Something needs to change – Anelka or Anelka’s mindset or my mindset on Anelka”. Well ideally, all three needed to change. Anelka need to CHANGE his finishing style. Anelka need to CHANGE his mindset when playing without Drogba. We needed to CHANGE our mindset that it takes time to convert from a FORWARD to a pure STRIKER role. Many may argue that Anelka started as a Striker at Arsenal but the conversion started when he was at Bolton. His role is to hold the ball outside the box and create goals, score them when there is no other options available. That a FORWARD role. Just my thoughts.
liverpool always play well against chelsea…even well they are off form…cuz chelsea is the team to beat….c’mon chelsea…show them tt we that we are the true blue champions…..wipe them out wif out beautiful football and extend our unbeaten record at the bridge
When a team sits back or parks their team bus before their goalkeeper, the best tactics that seem to work out is “Long Balls”. During the prematch interview i heard scolari will not use long balls as their tactics. Actually this was a bit of surprise to me to hear. How can a manager openly come and say that he will not use long balls in the next match. Its equivalent to leaking out our tactics to the oppenents. or atleast it sounds to me like that.
It is not good that if we stick on to a spefic tactics strongly. Long balls are good if used properly. There are some players who are capable of giving long balls to target man accurately. In our team i can see Lampard, Deco, Terry who are capable of doing this. My point is instead of saying no long balls, lets just say only long balls from certain people. We can stick on to a specific strategy, but at times of crisis we should be able to get adapt. We should not think after the match, “what if i passed a long ball when there was a oppurtunity in the match but didnt”. Sounds like arsenal way of thinking to me.
Please chelsea, play complete football, sometimes ugly, sometimes beautiful, sometimes unusual, sometimes silly, play everything.
We need a better striker…who should be the combination of Drogba and Anelka…someone like Torress(damm i love the guy or Amr Zaki,someone that has strength,pace and has an eye for goal….we should find that person in the january transfer window because we need him..
Chelsea 2 – Liverpool 0
Except Torres, liverpool is having a full team available for selection for this weekend match. Let them bring their best and we will show what they are actually.
gerrard is injured. dont know if he plays
Kalou is good. Takes his chances well.
As,for Anelka…He just gets his goals from easy places. Sometimes,he tries and misses.
Well Drogba still injured but he is still trying to buck up.
We need Morrientes from which club. He was on loan to liverpool from real.
Now im not sure where he is.
Valencia ..
as for the game i think we’ll win 1-0 or 2-o with Lamps on scoresheet .. cmon U BLUES
we need to but a striker, or play kalou as striker and with ballack back in centre mid and deco into klaous wing position
Honestly, we’re in first place in the league, we’re pretty much assured of qualification in the CL, and you people still insist on buying a striker?
I’ve got bad news for you then:
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=585170&sec=england&cc=5901
Looks like you’ll just have to cope with what we’ve got at the moment, which is the best team in Europe. Oh, woe is us!
Cant wit fo dd to get back fit, cause right now we aint scaryin teams wit the likes of Anelika or kalou. guys who would u say is the best striker in the league? Rooney? Nando? I would say rooney is payin awesome football right now.
I wish torres was fit fo the game on sunday. I would have loved to beat them wit their full team available. we should have gotten Andrei Arshavin. hopefully we can nick him in jan.
come sunday I hope chelsea brings its A-game. ppl been sayin chelsea is the team to beat. right now man u is the team to beat. they are the champs and playin superb.
we just have to take care of business now that some players are out. by the time we get back our untouchable players to the squad it will be over fo th rest of the league=)
Liverpool game is one we need to win . they will be even happy with a point. a point away from home against a top 4 team.
we have 2 wins and 2 draws at home , would need a win.
I think other than torres every one is fit , gerrard doesn’t have injury just fatigue.
stevie g and xabi alonso are both fit. keane is unlikely and torres is definitely out
chelsea vs liverpool, i just love this fixture.
Chelsea vs Liverpool match is gonna be real test for our attacking option. I don’t think Rafa would come at the Bridge for three point, he knows his team cannot win this Chelsea team (the team which has not lost a game for four years ). So, Liverpool will come to the capital for a point and they will do whatever it takes them to, sitting behind the ball,defending like it is their last chance to survive. We better expect pretty similar game like Roma played mid-week. Without Fernando Torres, they play quiet different football, But remember Torres’ injury is not that serious, he is young, he’s having long enough time to recover and did not travel to Spain, everyone including Rafa says Torres is not gonna play but i won’t be surprised if Torres comes off the bench in the second half or even starts.He could be Rafa’s secret card.
Chelsea has been outstanding against teams who play open football and a bit struggling against defending teams. But we are strong enough to break any defensive in the world. I can John Terry scoring another match-winning goal, Anelka punishing their defender’s silly error or Lampard extending our proud home record.
Ashlee Cole is back in training which is very good news. Joe Cole is likely to miss.So starting eleven would be pretty much similar that played Roma except Ashley boy for Bridge.
If Liverpool loses i really don’t want to hear Rafa giving an excuse on Torres’ absentee or their injuries. We are missing our big names, too. No one is saying Drogba is missing while everyone talking about Torres’ injury.Whoever starts or misses the match, both team will play the best possible 11. So there is no complain over injury for losing side.
My prediction is 2-1 to Chelsea.
STFP already about Anelka. You whine and moan about him every match, even though he has been a saving grace with scoring some critical goals for us this season. You probably don’t even remember the days when our lot would beg to have a player of his calibre at the Bridge, and that’s why you hate him so much. Here’s a clue: Strikers don’t finishe very opportunity that they have!!! Anelka can be a quality player for us, give him some damn credit already!
[quote comment="54366"]Honestly, we’re in first place in the league, we’re pretty much assured of qualification in the CL, and you people still insist on buying a striker?
I’ve got bad news for you then:
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=585170&sec=england&cc=5901
Looks like you’ll just have to cope with what we’ve got at the moment, which is the best team in Europe. Oh, woe is us![/quote]
Why wouldn’t Kenyon say this? Otherwise he will have teams/agents demanding way more than players are worth. This is just a strategized warning shot to remind everyone that Chelsea will not spend just to spend but I will bet you solid coin if Big Phil says he needs “X amount of cash” to snag both Champion’s League and Prem League Trophies – Abramovich will write the check.
Come on.. he just spent £200m on a yacht that comes with a missile protection system in the form of an “escape pod sub” for Christ sakes!! Lol
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/3143965/Roman-Abramovichs-200m-yacht-comes-complete-with-protection-against-pirates.html
i think the problem with people is that they are expecting a striker who is a true striker. Anelka is definitely a forward in that he plays much like rooney. he creates space and harries the defense to allow other players to come into the game. this works great when the other team doesnt sit 10 men behind the ball but if they do there are too many people around for anelka to do his job properly, he doesnt have the strength or aerial threat to cause problems. Anelka would play better off drogba if he was playing because drogba would provide space for anelka. As it is chelsea is forced to play a similar style to manU from last season when they didnt have a striker so they would have to overload the defense using 4-5 attacking players. The problem is that many times they needed ronaldo to bail them out from a fast counter, chelsea doesnt have a player with the speed and goal scoring instinct of ronaldo, kalou is getting there but his final ball is usually shit.
Everton-ManU 1-1 .. we have to win against Looserpool that win would be very very important
Ha ha… everton completely killed manure utd in the second half. Manure were lucky to get a point.
come on reds….do it for jose
let see if GP can teach Rafa some football, and i think if we are successful, we are very much likely it continue it all along the season through….make the reds return all red!!!!
i think BC has lost interest with this site. He´s not updating!!!
it will be huge boost if chelsea wins tomorrow . 5 points ahead of Man u . If we go to holidays with this, then Man u will miss a couple of games and when they are back, they will have to play a chasing game and also play more games , which will test the squad.
@BC
dude if u are having probs with running the site u can count on me for any sorta help, just tell me abt it…
Come on guys, give BC some slack – Blogs are a hobby. He is probably working on something rite now!!
=====Cech======
=Bosingwa=Terry=Carvalho=Brigde
=Lampard=Mikel=Deco
=Kalou=Anelka=Malouda
Chelsea 1-0 Liverpool
=====Cech=====
=Bosingwa=Terry=Carvalho=Bridge
=Mikel=
=Lampard= =Deco=
=Joe Cole= =Malouda=
=Anelka=
is it possible to buy tevez in jan???????????
Manchester United must move quickly to tie up a permanent deal for Carlos Tevez.
The Sun says Kia Joorabchian is growing impatient with the Old Trafford board as he was given an assurance in the summer a £30million deal to make the Argentine’s loan move permanent would be imminent.
Manager Alex Ferguson has since said the deal would not be done until the summer.
But Joorabchian, who owns the striker’s rights, is not prepared to wait that long before sounding out other options with interest from both Real Madrid and Inter Milan — and no doubt across the road at Manchester City.
He fears Tevez’s price is being driven down by his lack of first-team starts.
There are also question marks over whether the money is there for the deal right now with the club £600m in debt in the middle of a credit crunch.
Tevez, 24, has started only one of the last seven games since the arrival of £30.75m Dimitar Berbatov.
He was also upset at Louis Saha’s No9 shirt being saved for the Bulgarian.
juande ramos sacked!
Redknapp is the new Tottenham manager!!
About the Liverpool game, I don’t see any real significant result unless Chelsea win by three or Liverpool win. I don’t see us outplaying them too badly without Drogba.
Chelsea 1-0 Liverpool, in a total bore.
I hope I’m wrong.