Will The Real Nicolas Anelka Please Stand Up?

After seven successful seasons in the Italian league, Shevchenko arrived at a cost of 30 million pounds and scored less than 15 goals and plus some assists and in his first season at England. He was called a flop. After plying his trade all over Europe including successful stints in England, Anelka came in at a cost of 15 million pounds and has scored 2 goals and some asssts assists in about half a season. Now is he a hit?

Sometimes I think Anelka has been given a free role by Grant. He is everywhere while he need not have to. He does so many things in different areas and at the culmination of the attack, we do not find Anelka in the right place. There have been many occasions where he would be fighting for the ball while about four to five Chelsea players and six to seven opponent players would be between him and the goal. It’s good that he’s willing to take more responsibilities but that’s plain unnecessary. His wandering around is less of a problem when good finishers like Drogba, Lampard or Joe Cole are around. I would rate Lampard a better finisher than Ballack in the sense that Lampard has these instincts of a goal scorer that he gets himself into fantastic positions. When we do not have these players around or when these players are out of luck, Anelka’s approach becomes a useless tactic. We saw that against Barnsley and recently against Wigan.

When we have Malouda and Kalou on thje wings and Anelka is not where he should be, Drogba and Lampard not being there on the pitch, Ballack not really getting forward, Essien caught between attacking and defensive duties, where will the goals come from? Again it’s not about the formation. Even when he played with Drogba in the league cup finals, he was very much the same. His presence in the right areas in front would make the defenders less comfortable and possibly can create gaps in the opposition back four if he moves smartly.

Drogba also drifts along but there is a difference between what he does and what Anelka does. Drogba despite all his wandering around and hard tackling and his role in the defensive set pieces, he mostly gets himself in the right areas when the decisive phase of the attack arrives. If there is one evident positive effect from Avram Grant, it is the way his poor performance has overshadowed that of the some players. If not for the manner of exits by Chelsea from the domestic prizes, Anelka’s poor show would have come under spotlight.

You can’t blame it on our formation. Even when he was at Bolton, he was very dangerous. Bolton was also playing 4-5-1 for most of the games. When he was at Bolton which has been fighting against the drop this season, you’d normally expect the opposition to push forward and attack them. This used to create space for Anelka on the break. His pace was so useful when he had acres of space ahead of him to run. Back here at Chelsea, a top club, the opponents are cautious and normally don’t push forward so much against us as they do against teams like Bolton. This meant less space for Anelka to operate.

But then there are so many factors in his favour. He has the experience of playing in various leagues across Europe. In English league itself he has played for Arsenal, Liverpool, Man City, Bolton and now Chelsea. That’s a great plus factor. He did not have to re-adjust or something. It was from another club in the premier league, he joined Chelsea. Okay, he has not been scoring much. Even Rooney does not seem to score so much these days. The threat and contribution Rooney makes is way above what Anelka offers. Does anyone else also feel that Anelka has become less lethal and is easily negotiatable threat for the defenders.

Surely he is struggling with his presence of mind and concentration. You can even see this tomorrow. There would be occasions where a sharp mind would score while he would lose the possession while he would still be considering mulitple options. May be Anelka is complacent for various reasons. One, it’s not just him who’s screwing up. Two, even if he screws up, he has no imminent competition for his place. Drogba adn Sheva would be out. Pizarro comes to matches in Armani suits. Kalou is not an out-and-out striker. And there are some young ones. So he knows he will be leading the pack soon, unless Chelsea signs a big name striker. That’s the precise reason why he is not too fussed about being on the bench. Three, he is Avram’s purchase and would be well protected.

Generally, I think I have this luck. I moan and whine about someone or something. Next day, next week, it is addressed. I complain about Lampard not scoring, he scores half a dozen in the next few weeks. I say we are not scoring from set pieces and we score from some corners and free kicks. I say Grant is not quick enough in his subs. Then he does one in the 55th minute and even one by half time goddammit! In this series, I expect Anelka to score freely in whatever remains in the season. Heck, even Owen’s back on the score sheet!

15 Responses

  1. avatar 1 | mike ayad Reply to this comment

    i believe that if anelka justs stays in the middle of the attack (and drifts wide a few times) then he will be better than drogba because he is less selfish and can assist well!

  2. avatar 2 | Nihongo Blue Reply to this comment

    first the price is too inflated at 15mil.. he was around 8 mil but chelsea price is 15 mil as we needed a striker desperately and anelka could have played in champions league. Anyways when we can pay 21 mil for SWP this looks a bargain.

    second i think a striker needs to be a bit selfish. they are there to score goals and not to play wide creating chances. its other players job and anelka is a cool finisher. One should do a job which he is best at. Scoring goals add to strikers confidence and becomes more lethal.end of the season a striker will be known by the number of goals he scores.

  3. avatar 3 | TrueBlueInd Reply to this comment

    Hi guys..

    Anelka’s problem is that hes not playing as an out and out striker..he drifts around the pitch a lot, trying to get others into play..Thats a disaster in the 4-3-3 with him at the top.

    Anelka should concentrate on what he know best..thats scoring goals..

    Copy ruud van for God’s sake..just hang in and around the penalty box n latch onto chances..score 20 plus goals a season..thats why the club paid 15 million bucks dude..nobody cares about a strikers work rate..strikers are judged by the gaols they score..SO GO OUT THERE N SCORE

  4. avatar 4 | BlueFan nr:1 Reply to this comment

    haha drogba is hundred times better. anelka is slow. maybee if he plays behind the striker he will be better.

  5. avatar 5 | trueplatinum Reply to this comment

    bolton may play a similar formation to us but his role was simple finishing and counter, at chelsea he’s playing midfield, anelka will come good but i feel playing him with drogba will give him better results

  6. avatar 6 | Chris Reply to this comment

    Anelka is perfectly fine as a striker but he is more suited to a 442 than our 433. At Bolton, he was often up front with Diouf and Davies. Davies is obviously not an orthodox winger (despite his war with Evra in United’s away match at Bolton). We saw his best qualities when paired up with Drogba in those vital minutes against Arsenal a few weeks ago.

    He is entitled to a settling period at the club, and despite his lack of goals since his arrival, we are not having any problems. Our inability to finish off the Wigan match was unlucky, and the Everton match was always going to be tight. Next season, I fully expect him to have a partner in a 442, and it is then that we shall see him shine (so I am in agreement with trueplatinum). For now, I just hope he scores the goal that knocks out Liverpool in the Champions League!

  7. avatar 7 | Krishna Reply to this comment

    Should start Anelka with Sheva for the game at Anfield.

  8. avatar 8 | AGfriend Reply to this comment

    Anelka need to be motivated.
    maybe S Clark can do that.

  9. avatar 9 | BallackFan Reply to this comment

    We panicked when signing Anelka as Drogba & Sheva were hurt; Drogba then heading to ANC. Agreed. We paid too much.

  10. avatar 10 | BallackFan Reply to this comment

    We panicked when signing Anelka as Drogba & Sheva were hurt; Drogba then heading to ANC. Agreed. We paid too much.

  11. avatar 11 | MoiBlue, Reply to this comment

    Sheva should be played ahead of Anelka.

  12. avatar 12 | joseppie Reply to this comment

    Hello

    I am a life long Newcastle United fan who has a liking for Chelsea.
    It doesn’t matter who avram plays, because you have a lot of really class players. Stick in there because your still in it for the double

    Come on you can beat those scouse gits, cos not all the country is cheering for them.
    Good luck chelsea from the Toon

  13. avatar 13 | S.Tuzo/ Bermuda Reply to this comment

    I would like to see a 4-4-2 formation with Drogba & Anelka play more together, lets see what they can do up front together.Please keep and play Ballack more thank you.

  14. avatar 14 | ernest Reply to this comment

    Anelka is a good striker. Drogba has the experience, but Anelka is strong & fast. i see him scoring a goal either against Man united this weekend or against Liverpool next week in the champions league, if he plays up- front.

  15. avatar 15 | pandayumyum Reply to this comment

    Please give Anelka a chance, he can really do well as he as proved at every other club he’s been at. He has openly expressed his strong commitment to Chelsea and wants to spend the rest of his career here, which is really saying something consdiering the amount of times he has moved in the course of his career. Huntelaar should be brought in as well but Anelka can handle it.